As scary as these political times are here in the United States of America with a whole party apparently willing to be complicit with a lying, grifting, dictator-loving, Constitution-shredding president, I still have moments when I wonder how effective a single voice can be (especially on social media). Then I come back to the Einstein quote my oldest daughter taped on the door to her room:
“The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.”
We must speak out. We must resist. Silence always favors the oppressor and condones the ill treatment of minorities, women, handicapped people, veterans and all others whom the president has despicably attacked.
A new outreach tactic I’ve tried is to present a single issue for discussion versus a long list of justifiable grievances against the GOP. How ‘bout gun control? It is sad that parents can have moments of paralyzing fear just sending their kids off to school.
“I get stressed Every. Single. Morning. of Every. Single. School. Day,” wrote my Nashville cousin.“[My kids] are in 1st and 3rd grade and regularly practice hiding in their classrooms during Lock Down Drills, often coming home bragging about their hiding spots being the best.”
The knee-jerk reaction of all too many people to the topic of gun control will be to reference the 2nd Amendment, even those who haven’t read it and don’t know that the words well regulated and security are among the first nine. I say a right is a right, but still in question is the degree of the right. Can we legally own and park a howitzer out on our front lawns? I think not.
I took this issue in the form of this Sandy Hook video to a younger cousin, who lives in North Florida. If you go by the latest Quinnipiac polling (separated out for white without a college degree), he would be 58 percent likely to approve of the current occupant of the White House. My hypothesis was my cousin’s reaction would most likely include one of the following responses:
A) I don’t really pay attention to all that [political] stuff.
ONE TRANSLATION: I’m a certain type of person who can afford to not be engaged and/or ignorant because my rights aren’t in jeopardy next day/week/month/year.
B) I’m sick of both sides.
TRANSLATION: Both-sides-ism is garden variety conflict avoidance, a lesser but still reliable shelter of white privilege. OR you know your political party is totally off the rails, so you cite how an opponent is not perfect – and who is? – with the conflation allowing you to sweep it all under the rug of wrongness and proceed to your next brainless talk about music or sports.
C) No response
TRANSLATION: None needed. See conflict avoidance. And perhaps more proof that with so many more ways to communicate in this modern age, we still often don’t.
And my cousin’s response was [drum roll please]… alas, a combination of A and B: “Honestly, I haven’t really been interested in politics since 2016. It just seems like the politicians have gotten real childish since then.”
Then he offered a ray of light, some caring consideration: “I like talking environmental issues more than foreign or domestic policy. If the earth can’t sustain itself, all these other things people argue about are irrelevant.”
Maybe, just maybe the kids are alright.